HPRHealth Psychology ResearchTBA2420-8124Health Psychology Research10.52965/001c.39652GeneralAdaptation and Validation of the Texas Revised Inventory of   Grief—Present Scalehttps://healthpr.org/journal/HPR/10/4/10.52965/001c.39652GruppiRocio Luana,YaccariniCecilia,HoffmannAgustin Freiberg,FuttermanAndrew,SimkinHugo20221042022-11-29This study aims to evaluate the psychometric properties and internal consistency of the Spanish version of the Texas Revised Inventory of Grief- Present [TRIG-Present] in Buenos Aires, Argentina, which assesses a series of thoughts, emotions and behaviors in losses related to the present. A total of 285 adults participated in the study with ages between 18 and 80 years (M = 55.09, SD = 15.27) and both sexes (Men = 42.8%, Women = 57.2%). The three-factor model resulted in acceptable fit indices (TLI = .970; CFI = .976; SRMR = .064). The results indicated an acceptable internal consistency for Emotional Response (ω = .850), Not Acceptance (ω = .816) and Thought (ω = .837). The spanish adaptation of the TRIG-Present presents 13 items proposed by the original authors.Grief, Adaptation, Validation, Psychometric Properties, Confirmatory Factor Analysis

1. Faschingbauer TR, Devaul RA, Zisook S. Texas Revised Inventory of Grief- Present Scale. Am J Psychiatry. 1977;150(June):321-323. 2. Futterman A, Holland JM, Brown PJ, Thompson LW, Gallagher-Thompson D. Factorial validity of the Texas Revised Inventory of Grief—Present scale among bereaved older adults. Psychological Assessment. 2010;22(3):675-687. doi:10.1037/a0019914 3. Faschingbauer TR. Texas Revised Inventory of Grief Manual. (Houston, ed.).; 1981. 4. Neimeyer RA, Hogan NS, Laurie A. The measurement of grief: Psychometric considerations in the assessment of reactions to bereavement. In: Handbook of Bereavement Research and Practice: Advances in Theory and Intervention. American Psychological Association; 2008:133-161. doi:10.1037/14498-007 5. Martín Rodríguez M. El papel de enfermería en el duelo de familiares de pacientes terminales. Universidad de Valladolid; 2017. 6. Zhang B, El-Jawahri A, Prigerson HG. Update on bereavement research: Evidence-based guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of complicated bereavement. Journal of Palliative Medicine. 2006;9(5):1188-1203. doi:10.1089/jpm.2006.9.1188 7. Maercker A, Lalor J. Diagnostic and clinical considerations in prolonged grief disorder. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience. 2012;14(2):167-176. doi:10.31887/dcns.2012.14.2/amaercker 8. Prigerson HG, Maciejewski PK, Reynolds CF III, et al. Inventory of complicated grief: A scale to measure maladaptive symptoms of loss. Psychiatry Research. 1995;59(1-2):65-79. doi:10.1016/0165-1781(95)02757-2 9. Hernández Nicolás B. Desarrollo de la dimensión espiritual en procesos de duelo. Universidad de Salamanca; 2021. 10. Singer J. An Examination of Preparedness for Family Members of Individuals with a Life Limiting Illness: A Possible Protective Factor for Pre-Loss Grief (Issue May). University of Nevada; 2021. 11. Parra A, Reyes F. El duelo complicado y su relación con la resiliencia y la esperanza en religiosos practicantes. Psocial. 2020;6(2). 12. Piedmont RL. Does spirituality represent the sixth factor of personality? Spiritual transcendence and the Five-Factor Model. Journal of Personality. 1999;67(6):985-1013. doi:10.1111/1467-6494.00080 13. Villagómez-Zavala PG, Ornelas-Tavares PE, Franco-Chávez SA, Martínez-Becerra AK, Gutiérrez-Castillo LA. Evaluación de la espiritualidad en pacientes con duelo utilizando la terapia de aceptación y compromiso en la Clínica de Duelo por Suicidio del Centro Universitario de Ciencias de la Salud de la Universidad de Guadalajara, México. Rev Sal Bosq. 2020;10(1):22-30. doi:10.18270/rsb.v10i1.2901 14. Yoffe L. Religión, espiritualidad y apoyo social en el duelo, desde la visión de la Psicología Social. Published online 2017. 15. Li T, Wang SW, Zhou JJ, Ren QZ, Gao YL. Assessment and Predictors of Grief Reactions among Bereaved Chinese Adults. Journal of Palliative Medicine. 2018;21(9):1265-1271. doi:10.1089/jpm.2018.0001 16. Znoj H. texas-revised inventory of grief: Validierung der deutschen Version TRIG-D. Psychosomatik Und Konsiliarpsychiatrie. 2008;2(4):236-239. doi:10.1007/s11800-008-0131-3 17. Díaz C, Abal YN, Climent JA, Ortega E, López-López MJ, Casado J. Pérdida y Afrontamiento en Desempleados: Adaptación del Inventario Texas Revisado de Duelo a la Situación de Pérdida de Empleo. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnostico y Evaluacion Psicologica. 2016;2(42):111-124. doi:10.21865/RIDEP42-111 18. García García JA, Landa Petralanda V, Trigueros Manzano MC, Gaminde Inda I. Inventario Texas Revisado de Duelo (ITRD): Adaptación al castellano, fiabilidad y validez. Atención Primaria. 2005;35(7):353-358. doi:10.1157/13074293 19. Holm M, Alvariza A, Fürst C, Öhlen J, Årestedt K. Psychometric evaluation of the Texas revised inventory of grief in a sample of bereaved family caregivers. Res Nurs Health. 2018;41(5):480-488. doi:10.1002/nur.21886 20. Yildiz H, Cimete G. Adaptation study of the texas revised inventory of grief. Anatolian Journal of Psychiatry. 2011;12(1):30-36. 21. Nam I, Eack SM. Confirmatory factor analysis and cross-cultural examination of the Texas Revised Inventory of Grief (TRIG). Families in Society. 2012;93(1):65-73. doi:10.1606/1044-3894.4177 22. Wilson S. Journal of Social Work in End-Of-Life & Palliative Care The Validation of the Texas Revised Inventory of Grief on an Older Latino PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLES The Validation of the Texas Revised Inventory of Grief on an Older Latino Sample. Journal of Social Work in End-of-Life & Palliative Care. 2007;2(4):37-41. doi:10.1300/J457v02n04 23. Piedmont RL. Assessment of Spirituality and Religious Sentiments, Technical Manual. 1st ed. Timonium; 2004. 24. Simkin H. Adaptación al español de la Escala de Espiritualidad y Sentimientos Religiosos (ASPIRES). Univ Psychol. 2017;16(2). doi:10.11144/javeriana.upsy16-2.aeee 25. Iannelli L, Giglietto F, Rossi L, Zurovac E. Facebook Digital Traces for Survey Research: Assessing the Efficiency and Effectiveness of a Facebook Ad–Based Procedure for Recruiting Online Survey Respondents in Niche and Difficult-to-Reach Populations. Social Science Computer Review. 2020;38(4):462-476. doi:10.1177/0894439318816638 26. Li CH. The performance of ML, DWLS, and ULS estimation with robust corrections in structural equation models with ordinal variables. Psychological Methods. 2016;21(3):369-387. doi:10.1037/met0000093 27. Morata MÁ, Holgado FP, Barbero MI, Mendez G. Análisis factorial confirmatorio. Recomendaciones sobre mínimos cuadrados no ponderados en función del error Tipo I de Ji-Cuadrado y RMSEA. Acción Psicológica. 2015;12(1):79-90. doi:10.5944/ap.12.1.14362 28. Hair J, Black W, Babin B, Anderson R. Multivariate Data Analysis. CENGAGE; 2018. 29. McDonald RP. Test Theory: A Unified Treatment. Lawrence Erlbaum; 1999. 30. Davidov E, Schmidt P, Billiet J, Meuleman B, eds. Cross-Cultural Analysis. Methods and Applications. Routledge; 2018. doi:10.4324/9781315537078 31. Merino Soto C, Lautenschlager G. Comparación Estadística de la Confiabilidad Alfa de Cronbach: Aplicaciones en la Medición Educacional y Psicológica. Revista de Psicología. 2003;12(2):127. doi:10.5354/0719-0581.2003.17668 32. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Erlbaum; 1988. 33. Ventura-León JL, Caycho T. Q de Cohen: Comparación de Correlaciones entre Muestras Independientes en base a Urzúa et al. Revista Médica de Chile. 2017;145(3):411-412. doi:10.4067/s0034-98872017000300020 34. Fidalgo A, Quintanilla L, Fernández R, Pons F, Aguerri M. Detección del DIF en ítems politómicos mediante el uso de los métodos Mantel-Haenszel. Revista Electrónica de Metodología Aplicada. 2010;15(1):12-18. 35. Sheskin DJ. Handbook of Parametric and Nonparametric Statistical Procedures. CRC Press; 2011. 36. Lewis TF. Evidence regarding the internal structure: Confirmatory factor analysis. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development. 2017;50(4):239-247. doi:10.1080/07481756.2017.1336929 37. García Hernández AM. Continuidad de vínculos y espiritualidad en padres que perdieron hijos. 2019;13(3). 38. Jueckstock JA. Relational Spirituality and Grief: A Qualitative Analysis of Bereaved Parents. Journal of Psychology and Theology. 2018;46(1):38-51. doi:10.1177/0091647117753902 39. Lövgren M, Sveen J, Steineck G, Wallin AE, Eilertsen MEB, Kreicbergs U. Spirituality and religious coping are related to cancer-bereaved siblings’ long-term grief. Pall Supp Care. 2019;17(2):138-142. doi:10.1017/s1478951517001146 40. Platania S, Di Nuovo S, Caruso A, Digrandi F, Caponnetto P. Stress among university students: The psychometric properties of the Italian version of the SBI-U 9 scale for Academic Burnout in university students. Health Psych Res. 2020;8(2):9209. doi:10.4081/hpr.2020.9209